To receive announcements and news of updates by email, subscribe to the sf-announce mailing list.
Join the sf-discuss mailing list to ask questions and talk about space tourism, vehicles, power, and habitats.
More Info
RSS feed with expanded content.| From | Inat Hajduk <inathajduk@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date | Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:21:15 -0800 (PST) |
Thanks for the post Mark. Though I see it seems you are just forwarding on this article from another newsgroup or mail list... if you have a link to the actual article I would very much appreciate it... Well, I can't say much until I know for sure that this is true and a credible source. I did do a cursory search of the news wires and was not able to find any english news stories or any mention at all of Putin's comment to this effect (though I was able to find the tabloid/newspaper/whatever that this article supposedly came from and so that much I know at this point seems true). Hypothetically speaking though, lets just say this is true (and it certainly does make sense I mean who wouldn't be thinking this who follows international politics at all)... Even if it is I do not believe it would have any effect on the Russian space program's current working with private space entrepeneurs towards space tourism and the like... I think the natural inclination to this story would be, "yeah, let the Russian military devolve into a commercial chaotic mess, who cares (ignoring the own creeping commercialization/privatization of the U.S.'s own armed forces of course and our feelings on that) as long as they keep flying rich guys into space"... I think that would be a mistake. Do we really want a rogue military of the size and capability (even now after its evisceration by Gorbechav/Yeltsin/"casino capitalism"/etc.) running around dealing drugs and at the service of mafia/oligarchs? I think not... Without a stable state (which would be assured by a stable military of course) they would not even be able to think of partnership with private space entrepeneurs, development of the "Klipper," etc., etc. And as I am sure you would agree they are about the only major state out there right now supporting the fledgling private space industry at all...so what other choice do we have? NASA and the bush administration/defense contractor complex certainly are not doing anything of this kind (though their functionaries such as Griffin are making some of the right noises and such, real, concrete actions are few and far between)... Of course, given the implosion of the Russian military into a commercial free-for-all...the loss of organization, technical talents, etc. would have a catastrophic domino effect on all of the rest of Russia's enterprises such as providing rocket launches for other private space initiatives, etc. Not to mention the global instability that would result from a corrupted military of this magnitude. --- Mark Reiff <markreiff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > FYI, > > Beware of crackdowns (or shakedowns) in Russian > aerospace tourism. > > The sad irony is that the American government has > been messing with domestic > commercial space efforts for years. > > Mark Reiff > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Putin Attacks Chronic Commercialization of > Russian Armed Forces > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 16:49:07 -0600 > From: Jim Oberg <joberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Putin Attacks Chronic Commercialization of Russian > Armed Forces > > Nezavisimaya Gazeta > November 11, 2005 > Article by Nezavisimoye Voennoye Obozreniye > correspondent Viktor Myasnikov, > 10 Nov; place not given: "Top Priority for Army: > Supreme Commander Demands > Commercialization Be Extirpated From Armed Forces" > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com -- Space Future | To unsubscribe send email with the subject "unsubscribe" www.spacefuture.com | to "sf-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".